Vasanthi, Podiyan Pilla’s lover, and Rukmini Pilla, Ammini Pilla’s wife, live nearby and are good friends. A well-liked elder in the community is Ammini Pilla. When Ammini witnesses Podiyan Pilla having premarital relations with Vasanthi one evening while on his property, he slaps Podiyan Pilla. This incident incenses Podiyan Pilla, who then attacks Ammini Pilla with the help of his buddies.
Learn More
Ammini Pilla decided to give the rebel Podiyan Pilla and his comrades a little lesson for trying to take his life in a way that the Society too recognises it after the attack forced him to stay in bed for a few of months. Ammini’s refusal to file a case and decision to take care of matters on his own has upset Podiyan Pilla and his pals’ egos. They are searching for solutions since they are unsure of how to manage the situation.
It’s enjoyable to watch Biju Menon’s portrayal of local icon Ammini Pillai. Amminipilla is played admirably by Biju Menon, who has been progressing for a while. Between the fighting, even the smallest expressions that emerge with such clarity are wonderful.
Roshan Mathew makes a strong impression as usual in the role of Podiyan, a character who is rude, egotistical, and aggressive with an equal measure of fear. Roshan Mathew is able to change into a brash, belligerent man with a resentment with ease.
Padmapriya, who appeared to be an obvious candidate for Rukmini’s part. Even with a small amount of screen time, she exudes the most incredible presence. She can steal the show. Speaking “thekkan” (south) Malayalam is something Nimisha excels at. They aren’t simply reduced to being concerned about men; they also worry for each other in their characters.
Oru Thekkan Thallu Case is a tale about ego and pride and how they impact those living in a village’s limited habitat. The setting of a little seaside community in the early 1990s has been convincingly crafted by director Sreejith N, and the film’s central narrative is compelling. Comparisons are inevitable when adapting a book or tale into a motion picture.
Both readers and viewers will be satisfied with the first half. The second part, which seeks to diverge from the narrative, occasionally stumbles. The pacing is a drawback even though the main plot is intriguing. With a running time of roughly 150 minutes, some secondary plots may have been completely cut from the film to make it even better.
The pacing is a drawback even though the main plot is intriguing. The narrative illustrates how a seemingly unimportant event may occasionally balloon into something more significant. Its evocative, realistic surroundings, well-crafted suspense, and humor make the entire film watchable.
Verdict